In the warrantless invasion of the defendant’s curtilage, were the creation of claimed exigent circumstances and forced entry sufficiently attenuated from any illegality to render the defendant’s consent to search valid?
Should the Supreme Court adopt a per se rule barring the fruits of any search or seizure where police manufacture exigent circumstances?
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Argument in 'State v. Artic' September 11, 2009
This case (2008AP880-CR) is scheduled for argument [html | pdf] September 11, 2009 10:45 a.m. before the Wisconsin Supreme Court to review the Court of Appeals decision, 2009 WI App 12, on the issues [html | pdf]: