Tuesday, May 1, 2012

The Lochneresque monster

Just back from the recent Constitutional Interpretation and Change Conference at Yale Law School, Michael Greve posts,
"It is impossible to convey the constitutional establishment’s near-clinical obsession with, and hysteria over, the possible invalidation of the ACA’s individual mandate. ...

"The real fear is that the Constitution might pose some limit to progressivism’s anything-goes imagination.

"One could argue that the Constitution was enacted for precisely that purpose."
(Via Randy Barnett at The Volokh Conspiracy)