"On December 1, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Elonis v. United States. The question in this case is twofold. First, this case asks whether the First Amendment requires proof of the defendant’s subjective intent to threaten in order to convict someone of threatening another person under 18 U.S. C. § 875(c), or whether it is sufficient to demonstrate that a 'reasonable person' would consider the statement to be threatening. The second question in this case is whether, as a matter of statutory interpretation, conviction of another person requires proof of the defendant’s subjective intent to threaten."
Law and Policy aggregators:
The Wheeler Report | WisPolitics | RightWisconsin Features | WisOpinion | Hamilton Consulting News Clips
News and Publications | Practice Sections recent blog posts | Official Notices | Board of Governors Policy Positions |
Section Public Policy Positions
Thursday, December 11, 2014
Elonis v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
Federalist Society SCOTUScast featuring Kent S. Scheidegger, Legal Director & General Counsel, Criminal Justice Legal Foundation.