In this case, Dane County is asking the Supreme Court to review if it is required to pay the Town of Madison half the town's cost in constructing a bridge under Wis. Stat. § 81.38 [(2001-02), succeeded by § 82.08].
On June 10, 2004, the town petitioned the county for aid in constructing a bridge that would cross over a railway corridor and connect two previously unconnected portions of a frontage road. The county denied the town's petition on Sept. 9, 2004, concluding the town's petition did not qualify for aid. The town filed a notice of claim with the county and began construction on the bridge in January 2005. The town filed suit, challenging the county's denial of its petition. The town argued in a motion for summary judgment that it was entitled to aid because the bridge was constructed "on a highway maintainable by the town," as required by Wis. Stat. § 81.38 (1). The circuit court agreed with the town and granted summary judgment. The Court of Appeals affirmed. [2007 WI APP 177]
The County argued the bridge was not constructed "on a highway maintainable by the town," and "because the bridge was not on a section of pre-existing highway."
Pages
Law and Policy aggregators:
Thursday, October 11, 2007
Review granted in 'Town of Madison v. County of Dane'
(2006AP2554)