Friday, May 14, 2010
Decision in 'Zarder v. Acuity' 2010 WI 35
The Wisconsin Supreme Court today issued its decision in this case (2008AP919) affirming the Court of Appeals, 2009 WI App 34, 316 Wis. 2d 573, 765 N.W.2d 839. See Argument. Opinion by Justice Bradley for a unanimous court.
See 2009-2010 Term of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Hit and run does not require fleeing, by David Ziemer, Wisconsin Law Journal
Insurance company must provide coverage under “hit-and-run” policy term, supreme court holds, by Joe Forward, State Bar of Wisconsin
See 2009-2010 Term of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Hit and run does not require fleeing, by David Ziemer, Wisconsin Law Journal
Insurance company must provide coverage under “hit-and-run” policy term, supreme court holds, by Joe Forward, State Bar of Wisconsin